Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 30 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2331
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2331
Jane Smith, deputy editor
jsmith@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Nicholas Christakis thinks that pharmaceutical drugs are terrific—yet they work only some of the time. Alastair Santhouse thinks that psychiatry is the noblest branch of medicine—yet it is characterised by dullness of thought and practice. Ike Iheanacho thinks predictive models have provided countless advances in the understanding of disease and treatment—yet they are too easily believed.
All three offer alternative ways of looking at familiar things. Christakiss point is that doctors and patients have different understandings of what it means to say that a drug "works" (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2281). Against the patients standard most drugs dont work. "For example, sildenafil works less than half the time...only 48% of men are found to respond to the drug compared with 11% who respond to a placebo." If a toaster didnt toast bread every time, most people would take it back to the shop. He argues that doctors should routinely evaluate patients responses
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses