Published 28 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2095
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2095

Editorials

The UK quality and outcomes framework

Has improved quality of care and reduced health inequalities

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2030), Ashworth and colleagues report on the relation between the quality and outcomes framework and health inequalities in general practice in the United Kingdom by assessing the effects of social deprivation on levels of blood pressure monitoring and control.¹ Tackling health inequalities has been a consistent part of the political rhetoric in the UK for more than a decade, with primary care seen as a key player in improving life expectancy in areas with the worst health record and highest deprivation.²

Perhaps the most substantive government intervention in primary care in recent years has been the renegotiation of the general practitioner contract in 2003, which included—at its heart—a system of financial incentives for delivering quality care. This pay for performance scheme—the quality and outcomes framework—now links achievement on 129 indicators covering clinical domains; organisational domains; and additional services domains, such as contraception and patients’ . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester M13 9PL

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Breaking the mould in patient safety

Laurent Degos, René Amalberti, Jean Bacou, Jean Carlet, and Charles Bruneau
BMJ 2009 338: b2585. [Extract] [Full Text]

A good QOFfing whine

Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2008 337: a2632. [Extract] [Full Text]

Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes framework

Mark Ashworth, Jibby Medina, and Myfanwy Morgan
BMJ 2008 337: a2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Dunkley, A. J, Stone, M. A, Patel, N., Davies, M. J, Khunti, K. (2009). Waist circumference measurement: knowledge, attitudes and barriers in patients and practitioners in a multi-ethnic population. Fam Pract 26: 365-371 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Degos, L., Amalberti, R., Bacou, J., Carlet, J., Bruneau, C. (2009). Breaking the mould in patient safety. BMJ 338: b2585-b2585 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

True, but not the whole story

James D Gubb
bmj.com, 29 Oct 2008 [Full text]

QOF may narrow health inequalities but gaps in care persist for non-incentivised conditions

Jonathan R Bayly
bmj.com, 29 Oct 2008 [Full text]

Goodharts Law and The Quality & Outcomes Framework

Nicholas Summerton
bmj.com, 22 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Both soft and hard endpoints are important

Martin Roland
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>