Published 23 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2186
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2186
Views & Reviews
Personal View
(Not) warts and all
Phil Hammond, general practitioner, writer, and broadcaster
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Youd be mad not to protect your daughter against genital warts if you can afford to." So advised Peter Greenhouse, a sexual health consultant in Bristol, when I asked him which human papillomavirus vaccine I should choose for my daughter. The NHS vaccination programme may have opted for the bivalent vaccine (Cervarix) to concentrate resources on preventing cervical cancer, but every doctor Ive spoken to has chosen the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil) for their own daughters (and the odd son, though of course this is off licence).
Genital warts are common (100 000 new cases in England each year), and the condition is on the rise, particularly among young people: in women 60% of cases occur in the 16-24 years age group. They dont kill you, but they can kill your sex life, and in some people they can be recurrent and extensive. The health minister Dawn Primarolo claims that warts . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Government fully considered HPV vaccine
- David M Salisbury
BMJ 2008 337: a2552.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
"Annoyance" of genital warts
- Colm OMahony
BMJ 2008 337: a2553.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
All data on both vaccines must be considered
- Pim Kon
BMJ 2008 337: a2554.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
Related external webpages:
- Listen to podcast interview with Phil Hammond.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Morris, S. R
(2009). HPV vaccine strategies: the cost of HPV and the choice of vaccine. Sex. Transm. Infect.
85: 315-316
[Full text]
-
Salisbury, D. M
(2008). Government fully considered HPV vaccine. BMJ
337: a2552-a2552
[Full text]
-
O'Mahony, C.
(2008). "Annoyance" of genital warts. BMJ
337: a2553-a2553
[Full text]
-
Kon, P.
(2008). All data on both vaccines must be considered. BMJ
337: a2554-a2554
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Not for the boys either!
- Tim J Harrison
bmj.com, 24 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- Over optimistic view
- Patrick Silvestre
bmj.com, 26 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- Important to take into consideration all scientific data on both vaccines
- Pim Kon
bmj.com, 26 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- Controlling Information Controls Budgets
- Graham M Kyle
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- HPV and the larynx
- Peter D Bull
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- Gardasil: warts and everything else ...
- Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 28 Oct 2008
[Full text]
- Cervical cancer vaccine in developing countries: hype or hope?
- Joseph L. Mathew, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Ethical issues as well
- Paquita C. de Zulueta
bmj.com, 9 Dec 2008
[Full text]
- warts and other nonsense
- Richard J. stockley
bmj.com, 6 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Full consideration of HPV vaccine
- David M Salisbury
bmj.com, 6 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Who’s mad?
- Veerle Piessens, et al.
bmj.com, 4 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Phil Hammond, you need more adjectives
- Hanmant Ganpati Varudkar
bmj.com, 4 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Genital warts - annoying? Really?
- Colm O'Mahony
bmj.com, 6 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Cervical cancer and melanoma interventions contrasted
- Stephen F Hayes
bmj.com, 7 Nov 2008
[Full text]
- Vaccination for genital warts to prevent cervical cancer: principles first, please, before details
- Felix ID Konotey-Ahulu
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2008
[Full text]