Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 20 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2158
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2158
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Rapid and direct assessment by secondary care services is the key to successful management of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and stroke.1 A continuing challenge is the persistent notion that such critical events should be channelled through primary care, with attendant delays, in a way that would be unthinkable for a "major" stroke.2
A radical rethink of our descriptors of stroke disease is timely. Unhelpful terminology can obstruct treatment and cloud priorities.3 In addition to dropping the misleading couplet "minor stroke", we should also abandon TIA, a term dating from the 1950s that predates modern knowledge of stroke and sophisticated neuroimaging.4
Increasingly, the benefit of urgent assessment and intervention,2 and evidence of subtle persistent neurological deficits after TIA,5 are eroding the distinction between stroke and TIA. Stroke with transient overt symptoms (STOS) would provide a better match with patient needs, accurate definition of the syndrome, and ideally prompt urgent assessment and
Desmond ONeill, consultant physician in stroke and geriatric medicine1, Ronan Collins1, Tara Coughlan1
1 Stroke Service, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
doneill@tcd.ie