Wrong conclusion

doi:10.1136/bmj.a2156

Published 20 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2156
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2156

Letters

Transient ischaemic attack

Wrong conclusion

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Lasserson and colleagues show that people trust their own generalpractitioners more than NHS Direct or out of hours servicesorganised by the primary care trust.¹ No surprise there. Butthe researchers’ conclusions are wrong.

Strokes and transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) cannot be investigatedor treated in a standard general practice surgery; most of usdo not have a computed tomography scanner or access to intravenousthrombolysis. The best place for these patients is a hospital,and as quickly as possible. Arranging to see your GP is merelya delay when time is of the essence.

The correct conclusion is that we need to educate people aboutthe symptoms of a stroke/TIA (now sometimes referred to as abrain attack) and encourage them to head directly to hospital.In the current atmosphere of government led GP bashing the authors’conclusion is at best mistaken.

Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2156

Giles Field, salaried general practitioner¹

¹ Churchdown, Gloucestershire GL2 2DB

gilesfield@doctors.org.uk

Competing . . . [Full text of this article]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike Add to Complore Complore Add to Connotea Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Add to Digg Digg Add to Reddit Reddit Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Add to Technorati Technorati What's this?

Relevant Article

Influence of general practice opening hours on delay in seeking medical attention after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke: prospective population based study: Daniel S Lasserson, Arvind Chandratheva, Matthew F Giles, David Mant, and Peter M Rothwell
BMJ 2008 337: a1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]