Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2128
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2128
A comprehensive approach to ethical research
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Declaration of Helsinki is the cornerstone of research ethics.1 Its periodic revision provides an opportunity for debate about its purpose and effectiveness.2 The sixth revision, being considered by the World Medical Association (WMA; www.wma.net/e/ethicsunit/helsinki.htm) this October, follows extensive consultation.1 2 However, debate about the operational details often loses sight of the objectives and principles.2 Much has changed in the nature of research and bioethical thinking since the declaration was conceived.1 2 3 Public confidence in research is at an all time low, and the current model and traditional ethical tools seem to be failing to meet their objectives. It is time for fresh thinking.
The declarations objectives were framed, in response to past abuses, to protect human subjects in research.2 However, the framework put in place to protect subjects has been criticised as paternalistic and for failing to address the full scope of ethically responsible research.1
We propose an alternative comprehensive
Michael D E Goodyear, assistant professor of medicine1, Lisa A Eckenwiler, associate professor of philosophy, director of health care ethics2, Carolyn Ells, associate professor of medicine3
1 Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9, 2 Department of Philosophy, Center for Health Policy Research and Ethics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA, 3 Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1X1
mgoodyear@dal.ca
Read all Rapid Responses