Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 16 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2119
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2119
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Nearly 20 years ago, the US state of Oregon embarked on a brave experiment to explicitly ration health care. The aim was to create and then whittle away at a prioritised list of treatments covered by the state funded Medicaid programme, so that the available money would cover more people. With the global credit crunch likely to make scarce resources even scarcer, this weeks BMJ looks back at what can be learnt from Oregon and forward to how we should ration health care in the future.
As Vidhya Alakeson explains (doi:10.1136/bmj.a1563), the unique thing about Oregons 1989 health plan was its commitment to being both systematic and transparent. But it hit the rocks of an economic downturn, and almost no other health system has adopted the approach. Oregons latest attempt at health reform is more sophisticated, but, says Alakeson, it may prove just as unlucky in its timing.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses