Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 14 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2093
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2093
Douglas Kamerow, chief scientist, RTI International, and associate editor, BMJ
dkamerow@rti.org
A look back at the Bush administrations record on health
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
With the US economy in shambles, it is hard for the presidential candidates to talk about anything else. The small amount of newsprint and bandwidth available for other issues is devoted to Iraq, Afghanistan, and terrorism. Nobody is focusing much on health care and science policy any more. And when health care is discussed, it is mainly about coverage and cost: how can we change our healthcare "system" to take care of more of our population and afford to pay for it? Pundits proclaim that healthcare reform will be unachievable in the next presidents first term because there is no money to do it and no energy for anything but the economy and the war. This is depressing.
One thing that doesnt depend on funding, however, and that could be done immediately by the next president would be to reverse the unprecedented policies of George W Bushs administration that have
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses