Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 14 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2044
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2044
Vidhya Alakeson, policy adviser
1 Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, USA
alakeonvidhya@yahoo.co.uk
Oregons brave plan to explicitly ration health care in order to cover more people soon ran into problems. Vidhya Alakeson looks at the reasons and asks whether history will repeat itself
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Oregon attracted international attention after its decision to introduce a system to transparently ration treatments in its Medicaid programme, known as the Oregon Health Plan. But two decades on, the story that has emerged from the Oregon experiment is not the expected one of controversy linked to healthcare rationing. The real story centres on the limitations of this approach in controlling healthcare costs and sustaining state health reform, particularly in tough economic times. As the US electorate expects national health reform next year, the fate of the Oregon Health Plan is a timely warning.
The Oregon Health Plan was created in 1989 to expand coverage to some of the 400 000 citizens who at the time had no health insurance. Spearheaded by state senator turned governor John Kitzhaber, the plan was intended to extend coverage to people with incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level ($12 100 (£7000; 
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses