Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 2 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1761
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1761
Stig Pramming, executive director
1 Oxford Health Alliance, London W1W 8RZ
stig.pramming@oxha.org
Preventable chronic diseases are a major threat to health worldwide. Stephen Sugarman (doi:10.1136/bmj.a1750) argues that setting targets for companies will produce innovative solutions, but Stig Pramming believes collaboration is the best way to improve health
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This debate about regulation of business to improve public health goes back many years. Those who support regulation believe that the pursuit of profit is the only abiding principle of the business world and that companies cannot be trusted to moderate their practices in order to promote the public good. However, this simplistic and outdated view is less and less useful in the 21st century.
Arguments about economic systems, motives, and who is to blame for preventable disease are unproductive.1 In the case of smoking, a hugely profitable industry produces and promotes a harmful, addictive, and unnecessary product. However food is not tobacco, and issues of cause and effect just arent the same. Obesity is, in a sense, an unintended consequence of progress. Moreover, even if regulation succeeded in forcing businesses to promote better portion control or pedestrianism or healthier snack foods, such efforts are not guaranteed to change behaviours.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses