Published 20 November 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2632
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2632

Editor's Choice

A good QOFfing whine

Tony Delamothe, deputy editor, BMJ

tdelamothe@bmj.com

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this week’s BMJ we report a study attributing improvements in blood pressure monitoring and control in patients in English general practices to the quality and outcomes framework (QOF; doi:10.1136/bmj.a2030). Intriguingly, the improvements were accompanied "by the near disappearance of the achievement gap between least and most deprived areas." For editorialist Helen Lester, "This offers the tantalising prospect that the quality and outcomes framework is a truly equitable public health intervention"—and there aren’t a lot of these (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2095).

QOF has many detractors, and their criticisms are well summarised in the new report, Checking-Up On Doctors (www.civitas.org.uk). Perhaps the most damning is that doctors turn their attention to condition whose treatments bring financial rewards, while ignoring those without dowries.

Our general practitioner columnist Des Spence is underwhelmed by soft surrogate markers of disease reported in these articles (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2619). He wants hard endpoints: vascular . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

No marriage without dowry!
BM Hegde
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2008 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ