Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 19 November 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2581
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2581
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The POPADAD trial shows no benefit from daily prophylactic aspirin (hazard ratio 0.98; P=0.87) in people who have diabetes and early peripheral arterial disease. However, no firm conclusions should be drawn from a single trial, but the result be incorporated in a meta-analysis of all available evidence from relevant trials.1
The absence of evidence of benefit is not surprising as the trial was seriously underpowered. The annual cardiovascular event rate observed was only 2.9%, while the event rate expected was 8%. The 95% confidence limits for the effect of aspirin (0.76 to 1.26) include a possible 24% reduction in vascular events. This is consistent with the effect of aspirin in other trials of primary prevention. It is also consistent with the CLIPS trial in people with peripheral arterial disease, 76% of whom also had diabetes, in which low dose aspirin prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in vascular events
Peter Elwood, honorary professor1
1 School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN
elwood@doctors.org.uk