Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Cam Donaldson, director
1 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
cam.donaldson@ncl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fiscal pressures are prevalent throughout the worlds healthcare systems. Under such strain, it is natural to opt for "solutions" that seem to make intuitive sense. The latest innovation in this regard is top-ups for expensive cancer treatments here in the UK. Funny how politicians always look for alternative words for what are essentially "user charges." A popular one, emanating from insurance circles, is "copayments," and another warm and fuzzy phrase is "diversifying the revenue stream." But they are all different forms of user charge. The question then is whether such charges are a solution to the problem at hand. This is one area of policy on which there is evidence and virtually unanimous agreement among the experts. User charges are an idea that is intellectually dead, but it keeps coming back to threaten our publicly funded healthcare systems. It has thus been classed as a policy zombie.1
It seems powerful
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.