Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 31 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a868
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a868
Better information is needed about prognosis and treatment, along with decision aids to help patients interpret it
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Informed consent is central to management decisions in modern medical practice. However, sharing information with patients about the value of chemotherapy for advanced metastatic cancer is highly challenging. In the linked study (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a752), Audrey and colleagues assess how much oncologists tell patients about the survival benefit of palliative chemotherapy during the first consultation after a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, or non-small cell lung cancer.1
Although chemotherapeutic options have improved, life expectancy in people with metastatic cancer is often short, survival benefits of treatment may be modest, and the potential for unpleasant or life threatening side effects is high. Nevertheless, chemotherapy is increasingly given closer to the end of life,2 and patients are having to decide whether or not to have treatment at the same time as facing the harsh realities of dying.
To make informed choices, patients need up to date consistent information and comprehensive
Daniel F Munday, consultant in palliative medicine1, E Jane Maher, consultant oncologist2
1 Myton Hamlet Hospice, Warwick CV34 6PX, 2 Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex. HA6 2RN
D.Munday@warwick.ac.uk