Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 31 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1088
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1088
It is time for sanctions
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is an arresting thought. More doctors abet torture than treat the millions of victims. More than 100 countries condone the use of torture. A third to a half of torture survivors report that a doctor oversaw the abuse.1 Many prisoners never see the doctors who refined the techniques to minimise evidential scars, prolong pain, or cause psychological destruction.2 Estimates of the numbers of torture victims do not include people whose murders disappear when a doctor writes "natural causes" on a death certificate.
The medical profession ought to dissociate itself from torture—a practice that destroys institutions of civil society; that is used against colleagues of conscience, and that has far reaching adverse mental, physical, and social consequences. Instead, medical societies and licensing boards offer lofty condemnation, which is most ardently aimed at offenders abroad rather than accomplices at home.
Doctors who abet torture rarely face professional risks. Governments will not
Steven H Miles, professor of medicine and bioethics
1 Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
miles001@umn.edu
Read all Rapid Responses