Published 30 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a994
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a994

Observations

Ethics Man

Clarifying best interests

¹ St George’s, University of London

Whether patients have full autonomy or are incapable of indicating their values, how should we determine what is best for them?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

If from the lamp emerged a bioethics genie who granted me only one wish, I would ask for the ability to determine what is in the best interests of a particular individual. Armed with such insight I would resolve many of the thorniest dilemmas in clinical ethics, discerning in an instant what is best for the patient. Should we withhold treatment from this severely disabled neonate? Should we repeatedly inform this woman with Alzheimer’s disease that her husband died 10 years ago? Should we respect the confidentiality of this sexually active 14 year old girl? I can already picture the headline: "Ethicist wins Nobel prize for medicine."

Nowadays it is almost trite to say that "best interests" is a broader term than "medical best interests." While important, health is one value among others that may, on occasion, be offset by those others. Hence a bon vivant might accept the life . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The slipperiness of futility

Daniel K Sokol
BMJ 2009 338: b2222. [Extract] [Full Text]

Argus and the cyclops in the clinic

Daniel K Sokol
BMJ 2008 337: a1562. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sokol, D. K (2009). The slipperiness of futility. BMJ 338: b2222-b2222 [Full text]  
• Sokol, D. K (2008). Argus and the cyclops in the clinic. BMJ 337: a1562-a1562 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

whose interests are they?

peter h s critchley
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>