Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 28 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1029
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1029
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The last sentence of Sir Iains article emphasises the role of patients and the public in helping doctors to confront therapeutic ignorance.1 However, seeing the increasing popularity of complementary and alternative medicine everywhere, I believe modern medicine will fail to confront therapeutic uncertainties unless its practitioners offer their patients what they need most as human beings in distress: time, empathy, and understanding. This is one area in which practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine seem to score clearly over those of modern medicine.
As Brown has pointed out,2 a successful medical man has to exhibit supreme confidence and decisiveness at the patients bedside, whereas a doctor-scientist (trying to confront uncertainties) is likely to present a picture of diffidence and self doubt. Brown says that medicine and science require complementary thought processes; the processes that work for one are devastating for the other. If this is so we need two kinds
Arun S Nanivadekar, medical research consultant1
1 Mumbai 400050, India
arunn@vsnl.com