Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a933
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a933
Graeme Catto, president
1 General Medical Council, London
opce@gmc-uk.org
On the day the General Medical Council publishes its guidance on acting as an expert witness, Graeme Catto, the councils president, explains the background to the document
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The GMC has produced new guidance for doctors, on Acting as an Expert Witness.1 As well as being a source of guidance for doctors, we hope that it will help to clarify, for the legal profession, the boundaries within which medical experts operate.
Society needs doctors to act as expert witnesses; they are essential to our judicial and tribunal systems and help resolve disputes that require specialist medical knowledge. In recent years, however, there have been several high profile cases where medical expert witnesses have attracted criticism—for example, for giving evidence that was misleading or failing to disclose relevant information.
In light of the resulting debate, which included the chief medical officers report Bearing Good Witness,2 the GMC welcomed the call for clarification of its guidance for expert witnesses. Acting as an Expert Witness has been developed after extensive consultation and written with these recommendations in mind.
The
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses