Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 23 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a919
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a919
Ike Iheanacho, editor, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
iiheanacho@bmjgroup.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
UK researchers: beware the end of July. With it comes the onset of the long summer recess of parliament and, therefore, the medias "silly season." MPs disappear for extended holidays (sorry, "fact finding missions"), leaving the country to struggle on, somehow. The resulting lack of political initiatives, relaunches, analysis, speculation, and gossip means that other, supposedly more trivial, items are freer to jostle for coverage. Cue the reporting of medical studies that might not otherwise cut it as stories.
Yes, the season presents more opportunities for research to get noticed—but also to have it lampooned as too esoteric ("Look what theyve wasted money on"), unnecessary ("Now tell us something we didnt know"), or a direct contradiction of previous evidence ("Why cant scientists make up their minds?").
Of course, some research is too important to rubbish. Such is that in The Counterfeiting Superhighway, a report published, sensibly, early this month
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?