Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 23 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a886
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a886
Douglas Kamerow, chief scientist, RTI International, and associate editor, BMJ
dkamerow@yahoo.com
The obesity epidemic raises the stakes in the issue of statins for children
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Its not an accident that evidence based guidelines more or less began with clinical preventive services. Unlike treatment for problems that produce symptoms, preventive medicine is optional. We have the luxury of time to gather and evaluate the evidence for the efficacy and even effectiveness of screening tests and counselling. When someone rushes into your surgery bleeding or doubled over in pain, it would hardly be acceptable to send them away untreated to await the results of a randomised controlled trial for their problem. But that is just what we do when people want to know whether they should undergo computed tomography to screen for lung cancer or be given vitamins to prevent heart disease. "Sorry," we say, "insufficient evidence."
And this is even truer for children—at least when the question is whether to screen them for early signs or symptoms of adult diseases. Firstly, we need to know whether
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses