Published 22 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a914
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a914

Letters

Medical guidelines

For the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Spence’s article is one of the first things I turn (electronically) to each Friday morning. So it was disappointing to see him regurgitating the tired old complaints about clinical guidelines—stifling clinical freedom, imposing straitjackets, etc.1

I chair the clinical guidelines committee at one of the largest trusts in the country (and already I sense you smirking in that slightly tired and ironic way we all do when we hear about the latest addition to the festering heap of pointless committees that blight the life of general practitioner and hospital doctor alike) so I suppose I’m not a disinterested observer. We set the committee up for two reasons: to ensure that guidelines in use within the trust were evidence based and had the support of all interested parties, and to try to ensure that we didn’t have several guidelines in use for the same clinical condition, causing confusion for the end . . . [Full text of this article]

Bob Bury, consultant radiologist

1 Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX

bobbury@gmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Medicine’s living death
Des Spence
BMJ 2008 337: a674. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ