Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a905
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a905
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We recently ran an audit to evaluate the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in our hospital.1 The service is currently being provided by a sole gastroenterologist.
In all, 69 patients had capsule endoscopy over the 34 months: 41 women and 28 men , with a mean age of 63 (range 17-91) years. The main indications for capsule endoscopy were iron deficiency anaemia (46 patients), overt bleeding (12), investigation of small bowel Crohns disease (eight), and investigation for abdominal pain, weight loss, or persistent diarrhoea (three). Complete small bowel examination was achieved in 63 patients. In six patients capsule endoscopy was unsuccessful because of poor bowel preparation or gastric retention. The diagnostic yield for all indications was 53.6% (37).
The commonest finding was small bowel angiodysplasia in 18 patients. Other findings included aphthoid ulcers, inflammation, and oedema suggestive of Crohns disease (six patients), localised small bowel erosions (six), erosive gastritis (five),
Elmuhtady M Said, staff grade gastroenterologist
1 Barnsley District General Hospital, Barnsley S75 2EP
drsaid@doctors.org.uk