Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a764
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a764
Sam Shuster, honorary consultant
1 Department of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY
sam@shuster.eclipse.co.uk
Every summer we are reminded about the dangers of the sun. Scott Menzies (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a763) argues that the risks of malignant melanoma are real, but Sam Shuster is unconvinced
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The list of harmful things grows daily, freshly mined by descriptive epidemiology, a substitute for research that confuses association with cause. Although most disappear under the weight of their own inconsequence, the alleged increase in melanoma from ultraviolet radiation has survived on the life support of regular promotion. I am therefore setting out what is known, which is rather different from what is believed.
There is solid descriptive, quantitative, and mechanistic proof that ultraviolet rays cause the main skin cancers (basal and squamous). They develop in pale, sun exposed skin,1 are related to degree of exposure and latitude,2 are fewer with avoidance and protection,3 4 are readily produced experimentally,4 and are the overwhelmingly predominant tumour in xeroderma pigmentosum, where DNA repair of ultraviolet light damage is impaired.
None of these is found with melanoma. Variation is more ethnic5 6 7 than pigmentary,8 and 75% occur on relatively unexposed sites,9 especially the feet of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses