Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a892
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a892
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is much common ground between the protagonists in this slightly phoney war.1 2 What the argument advanced by Denaro and Mudge lacks is a pragmatic appreciation of how things are rather than how they might ideally like them to be.
Purely age related admission criteria are rare these days, with geriatricians selecting those with frailty, complexity, and disability. More importantly, the aspiration that all staff working with adult patients should have the requisite skills is a noble one, but sadly a triumph of hope over experience. Geriatric syndromes continue to be poorly recognised and managed, attitudes to the care of older people to be poor, and the care of older people to have lower perceived status and value than high tech medicine.
A gross disparity also exists in research funding, and the amount of training in geriatric medicine in both undergraduate and postgraduate curriculums does not reflect the fact that
David Oliver, senior lecturer, geriatric medicine
1 School of Health and Social Care, University of Reading, Reading RG6 1HY
d.oliver@reading.ac.uk