Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a651
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a651
Yet another twin-singleton difference is diminishing
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Twins are not rare—in many countries about 4% of newborns are twins,1 and the low birth weight and increased rate of prematurity in twins is a cause for concern for both parents and healthcare providers. Research shows that European twins born more than 50 years ago had lower IQ and academic performance than singletons. In more recent cohorts, however, the cognitive disadvantage in twins compared with singletons seems to have vanished. The linked Taiwanese study by Tsou and colleagues (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a438) adds to this literature by suggesting that the cognitive cost of being a twin is also small in the more developed countries of Asia.2
Twin studies are commonly used in medical and public health research to disentangle the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to health. Comparison of the health trajectories of twins and singletons has also provided a critical test of the fetal origins hypothesis, whereby growth
Kaare Christensen, professor1, Matt McGue, professor1,2
1 The Danish Twin Registry, Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark 5000, 2 Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
kchristensen@health.sdu.dk