Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a594
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a594
Jennie Popay, professor of sociology and public health
1 Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW
j.popay@lancaster.ac.uk
Many countries are turning to cash incentives to encourage people to look after their health. Richard Cookson (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a589) argues that such schemes can save money in the long run, but Jennie Popay believes the problems need a deeper solution
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Of course people living on low incomes would welcome more cash, but handouts conditional on behaving in ways defined as good by highly paid health professionals are highly problematic.
So what is the problem? Poverty has long preoccupied public health, and social reforms and charitable handouts have always been part of the response. But the welfare systems introduced in countries in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in the early 20th century signalled a shift from "the poverty problem" to a concern with inequality: from charity to comprehensive systems of social protection based on entitlement.1 These systems were not perfect but their fundamental aim—to develop fairer, more inclusive and cohesive societies—remains relevant.2
Increasingly, however, conditional cash transfers are the acceptable face of contemporary global welfare.3 Like means tested benefits, these transfers are stigmatising, separating off poor people from society. But they are doubly stigmatising because they also mark people
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses