Published 8 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a594
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a594

Head to Head

Should disadvantaged people be paid to take care of their health? No

Jennie Popay, professor of sociology and public health

1 Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW

j.popay@lancaster.ac.uk

Feature, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a673

Many countries are turning to cash incentives to encourage people to look after their health. Richard Cookson (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a589) argues that such schemes can save money in the long run, but Jennie Popay believes the problems need a deeper solution

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Of course people living on low incomes would welcome more cash, but handouts conditional on behaving in ways defined as good by highly paid health professionals are highly problematic.

So what is the problem? Poverty has long preoccupied public health, and social reforms and charitable handouts have always been part of the response. But the welfare systems introduced in countries in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in the early 20th century signalled a shift from "the poverty problem" to a concern with inequality: from charity to comprehensive systems of social protection based on entitlement.1 These systems were not perfect but their fundamental aim—to develop fairer, more inclusive and cohesive societies—remains relevant.2

Labelling poor people

Increasingly, however, conditional cash transfers are the acceptable face of contemporary global welfare.3 Like means tested benefits, these transfers are stigmatising, separating off poor people from society. But they are doubly stigmatising because they also mark people . . . [Full text of this article]

Benefits and drawbacks of conditional cash transfers4
Benefits
Drawbacks

Conditions are unnecessary



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Family payments: a cautionary tale for policy makers
Patricia J Lucas
BMJ 2008 337: a1134. [Extract] [Full Text]

Should disadvantaged people be paid to take care of their health? Yes.
Richard Cookson
BMJ 2008 337: a589. [Extract] [Full Text]

New York’s road to health
Karen McColl
BMJ 2008 337: a673. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lucas, P. J (2008). Family payments: a cautionary tale for policy makers. BMJ 337: a1134-a1134 [Full text]  
  • McColl, K. (2008). New York's road to health. BMJ 337: a673-a673 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

We need to understand the mechanisms underlying incentives better.
Richard E Ashcroft, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jul 2008 [Full text]
Conditionality and family payments – a cautionary tale for policy makers
Patricia J Lucas
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2008 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview