Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a414
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a414
Colin Farrelly, associate professor
1 Department of Political Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada N2L 3G1
farrelly@uwaterloo.ca
Staying healthier for longer has benefits for society as well as individuals. Colin Farrelly examines the efforts of science to delay ageing
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Has the time come to get more serious about the effort to slow human ageing? The advocates of the longevity dividend believe it has.1 On 12 September 2006 the not-for-profit citizen advocacy organisation Alliance for Aging Research held a Capitol Hill symposium entitled "Going for the longevity dividend: scientific goals for the worlds aging populations." This campaign calls on Congress to invest $3bn (£1.5bn;
2bn) annually into understanding the biology of ageing. That would amount to about 1% of the current Medicare budget.
In an era where media headlines are dominated by the war on terror and global warming, and much of the worlds population live in conditions of poverty and disease, it might seem insensitive and unfair to suggest that we should divert more scarce public funding into tackling ageing. But such a knee jerk reaction can be overcome once you consider the science and ethics behind the proposal.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses