Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3153
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a3153
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Contagion has been the curse of human health for centuries. Medicine has dedicated itself to preventing it. But what if diseases arent the only things that can be caught? What if good things can also be transmitted from one person to another—happiness for example? This is the hypothesis explored in this weeks BMJ.
James Fowler and Nicholas Christakis have been studying the effects of social networks for some time. Now using a unique data set—the Framingham Heart Study cohort—theyve analysed 20 years of data on nearly 5000 people, including measures of happiness (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2338). Within this social network they found non-random clustering of happy and unhappy people. Could this be because happy people choose happy friends? Or is the effect due to confounding, as Ethan Cohen-Cole and Jason Fletcher suggest (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2533)? Or is it, as Fowler and Christakis conclude, a causative relation? I think they make
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses