Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2873
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2873
Deborah J Anderson, professor of obstetrics/gynaecology and microbiology, lecturer in medicine1,2
1 Boston University School of Medicine, 670 Albany St, Suite 516, Boston, MA 02118, USA, 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Deborah.Anderson@BMC.org
Deborah Anderson explains why women really shouldnt rely on Coca-Cola for family planning
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Coca-Cola douches were a part of folklore about birth control during the 1950s and 1960s, before effective contraceptive methods were readily available.1 It was rumoured that the acidity of Coca-Cola killed sperm, and the classic coke bottle provided a convenient "shake and shoot" applicator. Recently, an old study from our group confirming the spermicidal effects of various Coca-Cola formulations2 was awarded the 2008 IgNobel prize in chemistry.3 The press releases surrounding our IgNobel award might have repopularised this method, and soft drink douches are apparently still used to prevent pregnancy in resource-poor settings.4 There are, however, many reason why women should not rely on this method.
In our study we mixed Coca-Cola with human semen (5:1 ratio) and reported that sperm were immobilised within one minute. A subsequent toxicology study found that Coca-Cola has only a weak spermicidal effect.5
Data from computerised analysis of semen indicate that the forward velocity
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses