Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 11 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2986
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2986
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
So were they right, the UK academics who six weeks ago wrote that regulation was "the real threat to research"? (BMJ 2008:337:a1732, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1732). If the BMJs rapid responses are a reliable guide, yes they were. This weeks letters pages host a selection of these responses, each vying with the next to show, in the words of surgical trainee David Samuel, "how prohibitive, laborious, and bureaucratic attempting to conduct research has become" (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2917). Can anyone beat my delays? asks Martyn Parker, whose randomised trial was eventually approved after a delay of over two and a half years (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2914). Further responses are welcome if anyone wants to try.
Its not only researchers who suffer the consequences, says patient representative Christine Gratus. "The pursuit of patient confidentiality, often by patient representatives, is almost obsessive and can be in no ones interests, particularly patients," she writes
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses