Published 10 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2925
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2925

Letters

QOFing whine

Don’t be an ostrich

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Spence’s sceptical reaction to the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) will have hit home with many general practitioners.1 Few of us spontaneously welcome the nagging computer prompts that interrupt our consultations, reduce our work to protocols and guidelines, and ignore the subtle, immeasurable aspects of the job. Nor do we like to acknowledge how easily our actions have been manipulated by cash incentives.

But wait, it’s not about us: it’s about our patients. The QOF reminds us to consider evidence based medicine for every patient, not just when we have the time or the inclination. I agree that applying clinical research findings to patients with complex cases is not straightforward, but that’s where the skill comes in. We have to start somewhere, and we can improve QOF gradually as we see its real impact on our patients’ lives.

So do we just squeeze in the extra work, get rich and . . . [Full text of this article]

Jessica Harris, general practitioner1

1 Eynsham Medical Group, The Surgery, Long Hanborough, Witney, Oxfordshire OX29 8JL

jessica.harris@metronet.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Lay your money down
Des Spence
BMJ 2008 337: a2619. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ