Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 10 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2687
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2687
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Richards advocates copying patients into all correspondence on the grounds of improving health literacy,1 but a sizeable minority of people in the UK have general literacy problems and are unlikely to benefit.2
As currently written, many letters from hospitals are difficult for patients to understand. My colleagues and I have had to explain to alarmed and bewildered patients who have received copies of their correspondence the meaning of phrases such as "the benefits of IOL may be limited because of the presence of incurable dry AMD [translation at the bottom of the letter]." It is not difficult to see why patients with several chronic conditions may erroneously interpret such information in the worst possible way, or even as a terminal prognosis.
Some patients will not want confidential details of their medical history entrusted to the postal service, or the risk that they might be viewed by other family members. Patients
Brian McKinstry, reader1
1 Primary Care Research, Division of Community Health Sciences: General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DR
brian.mckinstry@ed.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses