Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 28 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1184
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1184
S Paranjothy, Walport clinical lecturer in public health medicine1, M Eisenhut, consultant paediatrician2, M Lilley, consultant in health protection3, S Bracebridge, regional epidemiologist4, I Abubakar, consultant epidemiologist, head of tuberculosis section5,6, R Mulla, consultant microbiologist2, K Lack, senior health protection nurse (TB)3, D Chalkley, lead TB nurse7, J Howard, specialist registrar4, S Thomas, specialist registrar4, M McEvoy, unit director3
1 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology Interdisciplinary Research Group, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, 2 Luton and Dunstable Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton LU4 0DZ, 3 Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Health Protection Unit, Letchworth, Hertfordshire SG6 1BE, 4 Health Protection Agency (East of England) Regional Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 2SR, 5 Respiratory Diseases Department, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London NW9 5EQ, 6 School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, 7 Luton Training PCT, Liverpool Chest Clinic, Luton LU1 1HH
Correspondence to: S Paranjothy paranjothys@cf.ac.uk
A negative sputum smear does not exclude substantial risk of infection from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and either a positive sputum smear or cavitating pulmonary lesions have been considered to be infectious1 as these indicate higher bacterial load accumulating with longer duration of infection. The source of infection in outbreaks among children is usually an adult with these features.2 Children have been considered less likely to transmit infection because they were unlikely to expectorate infective droplet nuclei. In the absence of a positive sputum smear, guidelines do not recommend screening of wider contacts in addition to household contacts,3 although in the United States, contact screening is recommended if resources are sufficient.4 Here, we report extensive transmission of tuberculosis in a junior school in Luton, England, from a child with pulmonary tuberculosis in whom a sputum smear was negative.
The index case was a 9 year old boy of Black African ethnicity born in the United Kingdom. He was investigated by his family
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses