Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 19 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1319
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1319
Iona Heath, general practitioner, London
aque22@dsl.pipex.com
With an ever increasing gap between research and practice, where should responsibility for clinical decision making lie?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Every week the accumulation of research papers in this and other journals across the world adds to our knowledge and understanding of biology, disease, and treatments. The past 100 years have seen huge advances in medicines ability to relieve suffering and to extend life. The paradox is that we seem to forget as much as we learn as fast as we learn. Someone whose contribution we seem in danger of forgetting, at least in medicine, is Karl Popper, professor of logic and scientific method at the University of London from 1949 to 1969.
Popper argued: "It might be well for all of us to remember that, while differing widely in the various little bits we know, in our infinite ignorance we are all equal." And he warned us to "suspect all those who claim that they are authorized to teach the truth." His crucial assertion was that we can never
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses