Published 15 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1103
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1103

Editorials

Local accountability in the NHS

Needs to be defined before objectives are set, using experience from elsewhere

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The notion that the NHS should be more accountable to local communities has been gaining political traction as the government seeks to "devolve more responsibilities to the local level."¹ This is covered in two reports by the King’s Fund and the Local Government Association Health Commission.^{2 3}

The King’s Fund’s report focuses on local accountability of primary care trusts. It suggests that the mechanisms for improvement hinge on the nature of local accountability preferred by communities and on the government’s objectives. Existing arrangements such as local government overview and scrutiny committees, local involvement networks, and requirements for primary care trusts and other services to engage at the local level could work, if refined and given time to settle in. Other possibilities include the use of citizens’ juries and more involvement of local government in decision making by primary care trusts.

The Health Commission’s detailed consideration of the entire NHS makes many . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9015, New Zealand

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The rise of regulation in the NHS

Kieran Walshe
BMJ 2002 324: 967-970. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

New Zealand's new health sector reforms: back to the future?

Nancy Devlin, Alan Maynard, and Nicholas Mays
BMJ 2001 322: 1171-1174. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more>>