Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a935
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a935
Auditors identify difficulties with the programme of system reform
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A recent report from the Audit Commission and the Healthcare Commission, Is the Treatment Working?, examines the success of the governments programme for system reform of the NHS in England, promulgated in 2000 and 2002.1 2 3 The report, which includes evaluation of four important innovations—the creation of foundation trusts, greater NHS use of the independent sector, provision of more choice for patients, and payment by results—finds little hard evidence of benefits.
In most developed countries, healthcare systems have three main goals—to control total costs, to achieve equity in access by need, and to achieve excellence in performance (short waiting times, satisfied patients, and good outcomes).The economic logic is that—to achieve these three goals—we need three economic instruments. Since 1976, the NHS has successfully controlled costs with a cash limited budget and sought equity by distributing funds to populations in relation to their needs. The problem has been with improving the
Gwyn Bevan, professor of management science
1 Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE
R.G.Bevan@lse.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses