Published 7 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a288
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a288

Practice

Qualitative Research

An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research

¹ Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5 , ² Department of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Centre for Faculty Development, and Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Eaton South 1-565, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4

Related to doi: , 10.1136/bmj.39602.690162.47doi: , 10.1136/bmj.a1020doi: , 10.1136/bmj.a879doi: , 10.1136/bmj.a949doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035

This article explores the difference between qualitative and quantitative research and the need for doctors to be able to interpret and appraise qualitative research

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The number of qualitative research articles published in medical journals has increased substantially over the past few years.¹ Qualitative studies have contributed to our understanding of important clinical issues, such as patients’ reasons for following or abandoning medical recommendations^{2 3} and patients’ and carers’ needs and wishes at the end of life.^{4 5} None the less, healthcare professionals still have strong concerns about a widespread lack of understanding of the nature and uses of such research.^{1 6 7}

This knowledge gap can be particularly problematic for a physician who is asked to review, for a journal or a grant agency, one of the increasing numbers of papers that makes use of qualitative or "mixed" (combined quantitative and qualitative) methods. Several articles in various medical subfields^{8 9 10} have highlighted this problem in the review process. It can lead to refusals by journals to publish well conducted research because of a lack of understanding of the methods . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography

Scott Reeves, Ayelet Kuper, and Brian David Hodges
BMJ 2008 337: a1020. [Extract] [Full Text]

Critically appraising qualitative research

Ayelet Kuper, Lorelei Lingard, and Wendy Levinson
BMJ 2008 337: a1035. [Extract] [Full Text]

Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research

Lorelei Lingard, Mathieu Albert, and Wendy Levinson
BMJ 2008 337: a567. [Extract] [Full Text]

Discourse analysis

Brian David Hodges, Ayelet Kuper, and Scott Reeves
BMJ 2008 337: a879. [Extract] [Full Text]

Why use theories in qualitative research?

Scott Reeves, Mathieu Albert, Ayelet Kuper, and Brian David Hodges
BMJ 2008 337: a949. [Extract] [Full Text]

Acceptability of low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis for inpatients receiving palliative care: qualitative study

S I R Noble, A Nelson, C Turner, and I G Finlay
BMJ 2006 332: 577-580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Perceptions and experiences of taking oral hypoglycaemic agents among people of Pakistani and Indian origin: qualitative study

Julia Lawton, Naureen Ahmad, Nina Hallowell, Lisa Hanna, and Margaret Douglas
BMJ 2005 330: 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study

John Benson and Nicky Britten
BMJ 2002 325: 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research

Nicholas Mays and Catherine Pope
BMJ 2000 320: 50-52. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)

Trisha Greenhalgh and Rod Taylor
BMJ 1997 315: 740-743. [Extract] [Full Text]

Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research

Catherine Pope and Nick Mays
BMJ 1995 311: 42-45. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• van Empel, I. W.H., Nelen, W. L.D.M., Tepe, E. T., van Laarhoven, E. A.P., Verhaak, C. M., Kremer, J. A.M. (2009). Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients. Hum Reprod 0: dep362v1-dep362 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pope, C., Mays, N. (2009). Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ 339: b3425-b3425 [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more>>