Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 6 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1130
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1130
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Cooper (doi 10.1136/bmj.a1126) finds Menziess observations more compelling than Shusters, as he expects most dermatologists in the world would.1 2 He is also concerned about Shusters article translating into an epidemic of non-melanoma skin cancer. Finally, he professes to be unaware of evidence that ultraviolet light may protect against some forms of cancer.
We would therefore direct him to our recent lesson of the week and its accompanying editorial.3 4 The evidence linking major cancers—including breast, prostate, pancreas, and colon—to UVB light under-exposure is actually rather stronger than is the evidence linking melanoma (quantitatively responsible for an order of magnitude fewer deaths) to UVB over-exposure.3 4
This debate highlights how the more we as specialty doctors diverge from the common stem of general internal medicine that nurtured us, the greater the risk of our missing the bigger picture when an issue transcends specialty boundaries.
Incompletely justified high profile media campaigns about sunlight
Richard Quinton, consultant and senior lecturer in endocrinology1, Simon H S Pearce, consultant and professor1, John L Sievenpiper, visiting elective medical student1
1 Endocrine Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
richard.quinton@ncl.ac.uk