Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1464-1465 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39618.627951.80
Nicholas Timmins, public policy editor
1 Financial Times, London
Nick.timmins@ft.com
Sir Bruce Keogh has been credited for encouraging cardiac surgeons to publish their results. Now, as the medical director of the NHS, hes turning his attention to other specialties. Nick Timmins investigates
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
More than 12 years after the Conservative government first announced that the NHS would publish measures of outcome and mortality, the data are coming.
Previews of the first risk adjusted data on mortality from hip and knee replacements and aortic aneurysms are already on the NHS Choices website. Lord Darzis next stage review will promise much more, along with the development and publication of patient reported outcomes (PROMS), which use questionnaires on pain, mobility, depression and anxiety, and the ability to undertake the normal activities of daily life. Advocates of the questionnaires, which patients complete before and after treatment, say patient reported outcomes provide a remarkably sophisticated measure of whether a treatment has worked in the rather important sense of whether the patient feels better, and how much better.
How much hospitals get paid for a procedure may soon (possibly too soon) depend in part on such measurements of outcome.