Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1453 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39619.510405.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I am surprised that the SIGN guidelines (and therefore this summary of them1) make no mention of the importance of adequate cerebral perfusion in those with invasive meningococcal disease. Cerebral perfusion pressure is the difference between the mean arterial pressure (which is usually low from the associated hypotensive shock) and the intracranial pressure (which is often high as a result of meningeal inflammation and cerebral oedema).
Consequently, cerebral perfusion pressure takes a "double whammy," and the end result may be clinically significant cerebral ischaemia from profoundly inadequate cerebral perfusion, which is likely to worsen neurological outcomes.
The SIGN guidelines discuss the importance of early inotropic support, but fail to address the issues of raised intracranial pressure and the reduction in cerebral perfusion. If there are clinical or computed tomography scan signs of raised intracranial pressure, the use of osmotic agents such as mannitol should be actively considered and if
Peter J Flegg, consultant physician
1 Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool FY3 8NR
dr.flegg@bfwh.nhs.uk