BMJ  2008;336:1445-1446 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a480 (published 23 June 2008)

Editorials

Cardiovascular risk tables

Estimating risk is not the problem, using it to tailor treatment to individuals is

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the linked study, Hippisley-Cox and colleagues develop and validate the second version of the QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (QRISK2), an attempt to more accurately estimate cardiovascular risk in patients from different ethnic groups in England and Wales.1

The advent of the first Framingham risk tables in the early 1990s was a challenge for most doctors. Since the second world war the management of cardiovascular risk has been part of the core business of general practice, but the single risk model dominated. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia were islands, each with its own experts fighting for bigger kingdoms by pushing for ever stricter boundaries and demanding more attention.

Framingham taught us to look at the different risk factors, and provided a major lesson: a cumulative average risk could be more important than one peak. Yet soon the extrapolation of these US tables to European populations seemed to overshoot the real . . . [Full text of this article]

Thierry Christiaens, professor of general practice1

1 Department of General Practice and PHC & Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

thierry.christiaens@ugent.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Risk assessment and lipid modification for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of NICE guidance
Angela Cooper, Norma O’Flynn on behalf of the Guideline Development Group
BMJ 2008 336: 1246-1248. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Estimating the high risk group for cardiovascular disease in the Norwegian HUNT 2 population according to the 2003 European guidelines: modelling study
Linn Getz, Johann A Sigurdsson, Irene Hetlevik, Anna Luise Kirkengen, Solfrid Romundstad, and Jostein Holmen
BMJ 2005 331: 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Prehospital thrombolysis
Bernard D Prendergast
BMJ 2003 327: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Risk scores should not dictate treatment choices
J. Lennert Veerman
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2008 [Full text]
Risk is in the eye of the beholder
James P McCormack
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2008 [Full text]
risk management
Gerry E Burns
bmj.com, 30 Jun 2008 [Full text]
Drop the A from the ABCD2 Stroke Score?
Owen J. David, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2008 [Full text]
A new score for assessing cardiovascular risk
Alan Wallace
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2008 [Full text]
informed consent?
Patrick J Bower
bmj.com, 8 Jul 2008 [Full text]
Right question, wrong answer
Anthony Rodgers, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Jul 2008 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview