Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a529
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
With a week to go before the NHS is 60, lets look at some real outcomes. In the penultimate article of his series (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a385), Tony Delamothe asks how the NHS scores on patient satisfaction, mortality, and overall performance compared with other countries—surprisingly well, it seems—and Nick Timmins hears from the NHSs medical director, former cardiothoracic surgeon Sir Bruce Keogh, about plans to record more than whether patients live or die (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39618.627951.80). Sir Bruce wants to pilot and eventually publicise patient related outcomes such as pain, mobility, and anxiety to show whether patients really feel better after treatment, and by how much.
Meanwhile the NHS is facing a new responsibility: to cut its carbon footprint. As the biggest employer in Europe it emits more than 18 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, making it the UKs largest public sector contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The newly
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses