Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1410-1412 (21 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a292
Tony Delamothe, deputy editor
1 BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
tdelamothe@bmj.com
Funding the NHS solely through taxation has led to tensions throughout its history. But, as Tony Delamothe reports in his fourth article on the NHS, it still looks like the most efficient option
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The vision for a national health service came with the haziest of price tags, and it wasnt long before the bills started piling up. To balance the books, patient charges were introduced in 1951 for dentistry and ophthalmic services, and for prescriptions a year later. To curb the perceived profligacy of the services early days a ceiling was set on NHS spending—the annual contribution from direct taxation was limited to about £400m (
500m; $780m) at 1950 prices.1
|