Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1344-1345 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a253
Tony Delamothe, deputy editor
1 BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
tdelamothe@bmj.com
NHS costs quickly overtook its budget, resulting in limitations on care. In the third article in his series, Tony Delamothe looks at the difficulties of defining and meeting need
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| The Government have announced that they intend to establish a comprehensive health service for everybody in this country. They want to ensure that every man and woman and child can rely on getting all the advice and treatment and care which they may need in matters of personal health.1
|
In this statement of the NHSs founding principle of comprehensiveness, the crucial word is "need." The new service was set up to satisfy needs (as defined by doctors and other experts) not demands(as defined by patients). This was in keeping with the circumstances of its birth: the NHS was born into a working class society "strong on collectivism, reconciled to scarcity, and with a firm faith in the rationality of planning."2
This founding principle encountered two problems: one almost immediately and one as the years passed. The first was money; the second was the transition from a postwar to a consumer
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?