Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1340-1341 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39609.446701.59
Rebecca Coombes, freelance journalist, London
rcoombes@bmjgroup.com
Can a media row over a BMJ editorial be blamed on newspaper journalists misunderstanding of statistics? Rebecca Coombes investigates
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
What was it about a recent BMJ editorial that caused a leading UK tabloid newspaper to condemn it as "outrageous" and displaying a "backwards, warped view"?
The article, inoffensively titled "Increasing diversity among clinicians," (BMJ 2008;336:1082-3; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39569.609641.80) was written by Chris McManus, professor of psychology and medical education at University College London, and Hugh Ip, editor of Student BMJ. It argued against medical degree courses which deliberately lower entrance requirements in order to attract candidates from poorer backgrounds.
The 1000 word editorial went on to question the value of the £190 000 a year scheme at Kings College London, in which 50 of the 400 places are available for pupils from state schools in poor areas of the capital, even if they get three Cs at A level. "Is it worth our while to widen participation, particularly if this risks reducing standards?" asked Ip and McManus.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses