Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1308-1309 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39581.495069.AD
Stephen Atkin, professor of endocinology, diabetes and metabolism1, Christopher Walton, consulant diabetologist2
1 Hull York Medical School, Michael White Diabetes Centre, Hull HU3 2RW, 2 Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital Trust, Michael White Diabetes Centre, Hull HU3 2RW
Correspondence to: S Atkin Stephen.Atkin@hyms.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Publication of the original guidelines (in 2002) from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for type 2 diabetes predated the wholesale change in the delivery of diabetes services in the England and Wales. As a consequence of the national service framework in 2001 and the new general practitioners contract in 2003, primary care now delivers much more diabetes treatment, with fewer instances of insulin being started in secondary care. Consequently, the revised guidance1 will now be judged much more on its relevance to general practice diabetes care, including the drive to hit targets on blood glucose control.
It is reassuring that a trial of lifestyle intervention with education is still encouraged before a patient is started on metformin, rather than the immediate prescription of metformin at diagnosis as suggested in the consensus document from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care