Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1263 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a245
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Simon et al found that glucose self monitoring by patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes increased NHS costs without benefiting glycaemic control.1 Less intensive and more intensive self monitoring cost
92 (
117; $182) and
84 more than usual care.
Financial cost is just one factor to consider when weighing the benefits and costs of interventions. Patients who self monitored were more anxious and depressed than controls. Another cost is the time it takes to self monitor three times daily for two days a week2 when each self monitoring episode takes around three minutes.3
Self monitoring at the prescribed frequency would take 15.6 hours annually. For working age adults, the wage rate represents the gain from working an hour and the opportunity cost of an hour spent on unpaid activities, and it can be used to translate time costs into monetary terms.4 Using the 2005-6 adult minimum wage (about 
Monika M Safford, associate professor of medicine1, Louise B Russell, research professor2
1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, USA, 2 Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
msafford@uab.edu
Read all Rapid Responses