Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1205 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.a168
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The proposed algorithm in Jansen et als review reiterates old dogma1 2 and contributes to the UK having a higher trauma death rate than most developed countries. The authors failed to discuss why and how trauma services need to improve. The incidence of major trauma is relatively low in the UK and in the absence of coordinated trauma service provision the NHS response is often enthusiastic but disorganised.
A third of the 9000-11 000 deaths from trauma in the UK each year are avoidable.3 Many patients are left with long term disability. This situation has not improved since the late 1980s, despite advances in this area.
Clinical response services should be organised from the top down. The authors missed the point when quoting statistics from the NCEPOD report on the number of junior doctors who are first attenders at polytrauma cases.1 The report was calling for a more experienced first response.
David O Kessel, consultant vascular radiologist, Anthony A Nicholson, consultant vascular radiologist and clinical director
1 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St Jamess University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF
david.kessel@leedsth.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses