BMJ  2008;336:1203-1204 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39556.666944.80 (published 20 May 2008)

Editorials

Type of hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism

Transdermal oestrogen may be safer than oral oestrogen

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The results of randomised studies have been fairly consistent in finding an increased risk of venous thromboembolism with oral hormone replacement therapy. The accompanying systematic review by Canonico and colleagues finds similar results.¹ The review combined data from both randomised and observational studies and found that the risk of venous thromboembolism doubled with oral hormone replacement therapy compared with placebo (pooled odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 3.0).

Results from the observational studies alone were then pooled to assess the risk of venous thromboembolism from different types of hormone replacement therapy and duration of use. No significant difference was seen between combined therapy and oestrogen only (2.6 v 2.2; P=0.45). Risk of venous thromboembolism was significantly higher during the first year of treatment with oral oestrogen (4.0 for a duration of less than one year; 2.1 for more than one year), and past treatment was not associated with . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Marianne Canonico, Geneviève Plu-Bureau, Gordon D O Lowe, and Pierre-Yves Scarabin
BMJ 2008 336: 1227-1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]