Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1164 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39577.488507.AD
Michael Dixon, chair
1 NHS Alliance, Retford, Nottinghamshire DN22 6JD
michaeldixon@nhs.net
Government proposalstoestablish polyclinics are intended to reshape NHS services. Michael Dixon believes they will deliver more patient centred care, but Stewart Kay (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a130)thinks they are an unnecessary change
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
When asked by Department of Health advisers in 2005 to describe the future of primary care, the National Health Service Alliance and Small Practices Association suggested two models.1 The first consisted of nested practices on a purpose built site providing conventional general practice services, extended primary care services, and some that are currently provided within secondary care. The second model—the virtual super surgery—envisaged practices working from their current premises but having extended primary care and diagnostic facilities either within the practices or in a central "resource and treatment" centre. This is similar to the federated practices model described last year in a report by the Royal College of General Practitioners.2
Both models are in line with government thinking on polyclinics. They provide the basis for some much needed integration between general practice, community, and secondary care services, which could provide patients with more cost effective, accessible, and better coordinated care.3 4
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses